I ignore all the financial advice in books and have the government withhold more than they should to ensure I get a good refund. I know that I could do a savings program of my own, but quite frankly, interest rates are pretty much non-existent so it’s not like I’m losing much interest. And it’s just more fun to get a huge chunk of cash at once. I use it to put aside money for Christmas and the meat purchase and I buy big-ticket things I’ve been needing which usually means a pair of shoes. And then I buy big-ticket things I’ve been wanting. This year: Knife sharpening kit.
Essay: On hiatus.
No essay this week. I’m not sure why, but I think I got busy.
Watching a block returns.
Wheel! Of! Fortune!
Things you should know about going to a remote taping of Wheel of Fortune:
- The information emphatically requires no cell phones and no cameras. If you follow their instructions and do not bring your cell phones and cameras you will be annoyed because the vast majority of people DO bring their cell phones and cameras with no consequences.
- There is a lot of waiting around. First there is the waiting around to get in when you are herded, cattle-like, through a switchback of a line. However, Wheel of Fortune knows their audience and there are chairs in which to sit all along the line, for those who aren’t able to stand the whole time.
- For those who can’t really stand long at all, they just get to go to a holding area to wait for the rest of their party. This brings up unfortunate images of “culling the weak ones” in my mind, but rest assured that your loved one will still be waiting when you get to the front of the line.
- When you are herded into a seat, you may not really like your seats. That is okay, as they will be taping multiple shows and there are a lot of people who leave after the first show is done. Then you can get much better seats.
- They will want you to clap a lot. So if you try and keep up with Vanna’s clapping as the Wheel is spinning, your hands will be quite tired by the end of the session.
- It takes a very long time to tape three 20-minute shows. The taping itself lasted about 2.5 hours and that doesn’t include waiting in line. So get ready to settle in.
Observations gleaned from my session:
- Pat Sajak spends very little time on stage. When they have finished the round he immediately leaves the stage, returning just as the next round is going to begin. There is very little schmoozing
- Vanna is the only one on stage who knows the answer to the puzzle.
- When Vanna walks around answering questions, 30% will be interesting questions to which I want to know the answers, 65% will be the eye-roll inducing and grammatically incorrect “Can I have a hug?” and 5% will be people wanting to take their pictures with her.
- Vanna does not get to keep the clothing she wears. Given that she wore three different one-piece outfits that I found a bit ugly, I see this as a blessing. She does, however, wear her own shoes with her outfits. She reports that she has a lot of shoes.
- It takes eight people to move the mini-Wheel used for the final puzzle on and off the stage: four to push/hold up cables, and four more to place a rotation of press board on the floor for the mini wheel to roll over.
- I find the TV industry to be incredibly inefficient in the realm of labor.
- WOF has a “remote crew” out of Florida who do all the remote tapings. The regular crew stays back in California.
- There is only one Wheel and it is very heavy. Watching the crew change the wheel between segments was my favorite part.
- The reason the contestants tend to yell out their letters in a rather obnoxious fashion is that there are two people employed to make sure the candidates can spin the wheel and they hype them up as much as possible.
- When Pat Sajak mishears a contestant’s letter choice the stage goes dark, the contestants are ordered to turn around, there is a general murmur of discussion on the stage and then they restart the round with a brand-new puzzle. Also, Pat Sajak will tell you that it’s the first time it has happened in the history of the show. Don’t believe him.
- Because contestants are not allowed to name their actual employers, when a contestant identifies hers as a “local athletic apparel manufacturer” half the audience will lean to the other half of the audience and whisper “Nike.”
- The “kissing cam” was a hilarious part of the experience, even if I felt dumb the whole time for laughing. This was where they would show two members of the audience framed in a heart and the couple would laugh in recognition and kiss, to the audience’s approval. Or, they would lean over a row and down three chairs to kiss their spouse who was not the person in the frame originally, or attempt to hide their eight-year old selves as their older sister attempted to kiss them, or sit uncomfortably as their wife moves in for the kiss. Good clean fun.
- When the productions likes us, they give us super cool Wheel of Fortune blinky pins that are very fun to wear at school the next day.
Rainbow
Requiem: tank top, jewelry box, mirror, bag.
Books read in March 2012
Only three YA books of seven this month? Not bad, not bad. Book of note: even if you aren’t interested in Biosphere 2, Dreaming the Biosphere is a great piece of nonfiction. I hope to read more by Reider.
Matt and I read aloud.
More great manipulation coming from every direction. It was nice read it over a period of weeks, rather than days.
It took about 150 pages for me to really like it, but then WHAMMO! I was all in and various daily chores were put off. There were a lot of similarities between the main character Katsa and a certain Katniss Everdeen from the Hunger Games, and a bit of research shows that both books were published within a month of each other in 2008. The idea of Gracelings were quite interesting and Katsa’s struggle for freedom was meaningful.
I rarely read Goodreads reviews of a book until after I’ve written my own, but this was an exception. I was quite surprised at the number of people who disliked the book for its purported “message.” According to several reviewers, this book existed to warn women away from marriage, as the main character is quite adamant she will not marry, due to the fact that she does not want a man to control her. Many women expressed they they don’t feel oppressed by their marriage and they didn’t like the author pushing the opposite of marriage upon them. This was interesting to me, as I find people who apply their own feelings to characters in fantasy settings are kind of missing the point of fantasy novels, and, at the same time, from the view of marriage and owning women, they disregard most of human history. They may be lucky enough to not feel oppressed in their marriages, but I’m not sure women even 40 years ago could say the same.
Read for Kenton Book Club.
This book had an interesting premise (letters written to Galileo from his illegitimate daughter who became a nun) and I thought the scientist-to-nun ratio was exactly opposite of what it should be. I was much more interested in the life of a cloistered nun, but the author has a scientific bent and not a social historian’s bent and thus, we disagreed as to what is most interesting. The politics of science and the Cathloc church were interesting and many people in book group liked this book, but I was not one of them.
Biosphere II loomed large in my young adulthood wonderings. For some reason, I was fascinated by the idea of living in a completely closed space for two years with seven other people. When the mission ended, I read that all of the participants had pledged to not share what went on while inside the Biosphere and I was disappointed I would never find out.
But “nevers” have a way of wandering off as time passes and I’ve since discovered that there are books about the Biosphere II mission written by the insiders. This, however, is written by an outsider and tells the tale of the creation of the Biosphere, which is as fascinating a story as the Biosphere II story itself. Recommended.
I’ve not read Murakami before and this was a fabulous introduction. I loved the writing and this was one of those books that I just kept reading until I was done, which was unfortunate as it is a very long book. It came in handy for days spent in airports, though. I loved every minute of the story. Until I was done. Upon finishing the 925th and final page, I felt a bit cheated. “I just read almost one thousand pages for that story?” I wondered to myself. Still, the great prose made this a good experience, even if the I felt sold short by the ending. Also, there’s a lot of sex. A lot. I find this interesting as most novels just briefly describe the encounter or sort of brush by it in the style of movies from the 1950s. Do all his novels have so much sex in them? Either way, I’ll read more by Murakami. Who has recommendations for what to read next?
I have never referred to a cookbook as “hilarious” before, but this was that. I think I found the book funny because Reese seems to have a very familiar style of cooking, that is, getting a bit overwhelmed in her projects. So if you lean in that direction, you might enjoy this book just for reading. There was also a great essay about her mother’s dislike of cooking that pulled a few heartstrings. Also, aside from good reading, I loved the recipes. The book came from the library and I started to mark recipes to copy before returning. After about the first five I realized I should just buy the book. So I did. I’ve already made: bread, bagels(!) cream cheese, almond butter, yogurt and ginger ale.
Kristin Cashore
Note: I just checked out some reviews and again with the hating on Cashore’s “anti-marriage, pro-casual-sex views.” Who ARE these people? Not everyone’s so into marriage and most people I know are pro-casual-sex. Neither position means the other one is bad. Also, is it just being called casual sex because the characters are not married? They are in exclusive relationships. Is this book such a threat because it’s written for teenage girls? I’m beginning to wonder if this author popped up on some list: “Read this anti-marriage, pro-casual-sex author and say bad things about her.”
Requiem: 3 shirts
Three sentence movie reviews: Tom, Dick and Harry
A “zany comedy” recommended by the library’s blog, this was a bit slow (as befitting a movie made 70 years ago) and I enjoyed Ginger Roger’s slightly dingy main character. Having only seen her with Fred Astaire, I was intrigued to see her on her own. I wasn’t happy with the ending, but a movie that is about three generations out of my own expereince isn’t probably going to have the same idea of “happy ending” as I do.
Three sentence movie reviews: The Incredible Hulk
I liked Edward Norton as Bruce Banner, it worked for me though I know others were not so happy with his performance. I can never decide if Liv Tyler is a good actress or if I just like her so much I’m happy to watch her no matter her acting ability. Overall, not a bad way to spend an evening.