Three sentence movie reviews: Palo Alto

I liked this movie, both for Jack Kilmer’s performance* and for the gauzy way the story unfolds. Based on a series of stories written by James Franco, the movie is unflinching in depicting everyday rape culture, and I wonder how much Gia Coppola’s direction has to do with this.**  It’s one of those movies where I think maybe the kids of Palo Alto need a little less free time, a little less money, and perhaps something to believe in; yet also, I was mesmerized by the film itself.

Cost: free from library
Where watched: at home

*”Who is that?” I wondered aloud during his first scene.  His performance wasn’t showy, but he had full command of the screen.  It made sense when I figured out he was the son of Val Kilmer and Joanne Whalley.  This was his first role.

**DVD extras provide an interview with James Franco, where he discusses how strongly he felt that Gia Coppla should direct this movie, even going so far as to take a role in a film, simply to obtain the rest of the funding necessary to film.  He’s also creepy good as the soccer coach.

poster from: http://www.impawards.com/2014/palo_alto.html

3 thoughts on “Three sentence movie reviews: Palo Alto”

  1. Oh how this feels NFS. I can just tell from your comments. Nice to see a woman director.

    And WOWZERS! Nice work getting the blog caught up to NOW!!! I can only comment on 11 posts this morning…but I let myself preview a few from my reader.

  2. Oh gosh, this post reminded me of how beautiful and charming Val Kilmer was back in the day. I see his son has good hair game like him. I recently watched a whole series (Eyewitness) without realizing that one of the show’s leads is Bill Paxton’s son. Once I read it, I could totally see it.

    Is the soccer coach a creep? Maybe James Franco is good at playing a creep because he IS a creep.

    1. I’ve gotten to the point where I think that all men in Hollywood are creeps. It saves me from being disappointed when I find out they are. I did have a small smidgen of hope that he wasn’t, but those hopes have been dashed. On the one hand, he fought hard so a woman could direct his film. On the other hand, he may have abused his power in his acting school. Sadly, the scale tips stronger in one direction than the other.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *