Three sentence movie reviews: Winter’s Bone

I watch a lot of movies and every once in awhile a movie hits the sweet spot and leaves me with an elated feeling that lasts a few days.  This was such a movie and I highly recommend it, all those quotes on the poster are spot-on.     It transported me to a world I (thankfully) don’t know, it had amazing acting (much of it done by normal looking people) the story was gripping, and the lives shown were depicted in such a matter-of-fact fashion that I simply experienced the movie it happened and then spent a lot of time thinking about it after.

Three sentence movie reviews: The Pirates! Band of Misfits!

We saw this for free too and it was not very good (Matt fell asleep).  There are some animated films (Incredibles, Finding Nemo, Up, etc.) that are very good watching for adults and then there are some animated films that just aren’t.  I saw a preview for this film yesterday and there were so many good bits in the preview, I found myself wondering why they didn’t all knit together nicely into a good movie.

Three sentence movie reviews: Battleship

Another for-free flick, this was quite enjoyable mostly because it wasn’t very good, but we expected that, seeing as how Hasbro (a-hem: toy manufacturer) is the first title card they put on the screen.  I thought that, aside from Alexander Skarsgard who was a horrible actor, Rihanna was incredibly awful and I spent a lot of time wondering why they didn’t hire some nice black actress who could act and actually needed the money, while Matt was not too bothered by the both of them and couldn’t stand real-life Iraq hero Gregory D. Gadson who I thought was fine.  So there’s a possibility that this might be a good movie after all for just the right person, although it’s a slim possibility indeed.

Instead of watching Battleship, watch How it Should Have Ended: Transformers Play Battleship.

ps.  I chose this poster because my friend is having a “thing” for Taylor Kitsch that parallels my Chris Hemsworth thing.

Essay: Etta.

Just as I can recall where I was when the spaceship
Challenger exploded* and when I heard that Jerry Garcia died,** so I can tell
you exactly where I was the first time I really heard Etta James.
My time with the Fresh Pond Bread and Circus was brief, from
a life-span perspective.  I only worked
there about two years.  But the short
amount of time spent there coincided with a period in my life where a lot of
things were happening.  It was a period
like High School.  High School is three
years—at least it was in my case—which seems like forever when you are in it,
but is a small amount of time overall. 
However, so many things are going on during those three years, that the
story written of your life about that period would be a weighty tome, full of
John Irving-like labyrinth plot combined with Michael Chabon-dense prose. Whereas
the story written about the three years of work you did mid-career would be a
short, (and most likely boring) novella. 
See: Shopgirl.
At Bread and Circus, I worked in Prepared Foods.  In less fancy grocery stores, Prepared Foods
would be known as the deli section.  We
sliced and packaged lunch meat to order—never ahead of time.  We scooped various vegetable, grain and meat
dishes for picky people who couldn’t be bothered to cook for themselves: “I’d like the carrot, onion and potato dish,
but I don’t want any onions.”  We cut
cooked chicken into quarters and scooped tubs of mashed potatoes and macaroni
and cheese.  We gave samples to people,
refilled the dishes when they were low, put away everything at night and pulled
it out again every morning.  When we
needed a break, from the customers or the monotony, we would wander back to the
kitchens to grab some water and chat with the cooks.
In my opinion, the cooks had the better job.  They avoided the customers, cranked out a lot
of the food we sold and actually made something.  Out front, we were like the ocean, lapping at
the shore. A dish would run low, we would refill it.  It would run low, we would refill it.  After all the refilling, the tide would go
out at the end of the day and all the dishes would be emptied back into the
containers.  In the morning, the new crew
would take that same food out of the same containers we had placed it in eight
hours before and put it back in a dish and begin the refilling process.  Whereas, I watched the cooks actually do
something like take massive amounts of eggs, some of the prosciutto ends, a bit
of spinach and several pie crusts.  With
a bit of chatter among their colleagues as they worked and some chopping,
mixing and stirring, six quiche would appear from the ovens, ready to sell.
The cooks also got to listen to their own music while they
worked.  Out front, we were held hostage
to whatever the muzack station was playing. Sometimes that wasn’t a bad
thing.  By that point, muszack had
expanded to playing actual music on genre specific stations.  At times, we were even lucky enough that the
otherwise straight-laced manger put on the 70s hard rock station.  I can guarantee that most of America has not
had the pleasure of scooping Orzo Salad, humming along to Led Zeppelin, only to
emerge from the case with a full container to hear the “lady who lunches” with
the fur coat and the coiffed hair say in a voice of upper class outrage, “What are they playing? It’s entirely too loud!”  Alas, the lady would then usually march over
to customer service and complain and this happened enough that pretty soon we
did not hear the 70s hard rock station played very often.  Mostly it was middle-of-the-road adult light
rock, but I did hear Dan Bern played a few times, much to my excitement.
The cooks’ taste in music was eclectic and so it was always
interesting to hear what was going on in the back.  One day, 
I was taking a long drink of water and Andy changed out the CD.  A great sweep of violins filled the space,
followed by two sustained notes by an amazingly powerful voice.  We were four measures in and I was
hooked.  “Who is this?” I asked.
“Etta James.” Andy told me.
I’d never heard of her, but I found reasons to wander
through the kitchen again and again as the CD played.  It wasn’t long before I had my own copy.  Etta James. Her best.  Then, I would annoy the cooks and sing along,
telling them that my voice was just like hers. 
We all new that it wasn’t, and they felt free to remind me.
I lived with four roommates at the time—all women, all in
similar life transitions as I was.  Given
that we were young and in our twenties, we all smoked and would often sit
around the kitchen table drinking cheap wine, smoking and talking.  There would usually be music playing and Etta
James was in heavy rotation.  I’m glad I
don’t smoke anymore and that my life is not as full of transitions, but I
wouldn’t trade those conversations around the table.
It seems like everyone knows, “At Last.”  I once read that countless brides have swept
down the aisle to it, and it was played at Barack Obama’s inauguration.  One year at Boston’s Fourth of July Fireworks
celebration, I even saw fireworks explode in time to it. It’s a good song and I
like it too, but it’s not my favorite Etta James song.  That would be “Sunday Kind of Love.”
I’ve rejected marriage for myself, so I won’t be sweeping
down the aisle to “At Last,” but even if I was going to get married, it would
be the choice anyway.  It’s a song that’s
bit too sure of itself, and I sometimes worry that the singer maybe isn’t quite
able to see the whole picture. That perhaps she’s overcompensating in some way.  I mean, “my lonely days are over, and life is
like a song.”?  I’ve read enough novels
to know that you can be lonely, even after your love has come along and “life
is like a song” is a bit too fairy tale for me.
“Sunday Kind of Love” however is more of a classified ad, or
a nice list of goals.  The song starts
with just her big powerful voice, telling us that she “wants a”—and then the band
comes in on “Sunday kind of love/A love
to last past, Saturday night.”  At the
time I heard this song, I was in what seemed at the time  to be an extended
period of not being in a relationship. 
In fact, Linda McCartney died and Paul McCartney mourned and remarried
and I was still not in a relationship. 
“I’ve been single longer than Paul McCartney!” I exclaimed to my friend
while looking at the magazine cover of the wedding picture while standing in line
at the store. The older woman behind me snorted with laughter.
I dated, which was no fun at all, and cycled through some
relationships that were Junior High in length—no more than a few weeks.  My lack of a steady relationship was one of
many unsure things in my life: When would I move to Portland? What would I do
for a living?  Should I go back to
school? Would that job over there be better for me? Who, exactly would love me?
I related to Etta James “Sunday Kind of Love” lament.  And I eventually figured things out, mostly.
*Watching on TV with the rest of my fifth-grade class
**Working at a liquor store in Boise, Idaho.  I’d just come from my other job at a Super 8
motel and I heard the news on the radio. 
My friend Sara, who worked there too, commented that she thought I had
heard, or she would have told me.

Three sentence movie reviews: The Five-Year Engagement

We saw this for free and I had low expectations, but found it to be quite good and also a great example of modern couple dynamics (unlike say, He’s Just Not That Into You).  However, it is a romantic comedy written by two men not interested in holding the romantic comedy genre sacred so there are a lot of f-bombs and the sex is quite real-world graphic in places, at least for a romantic comedy.  That said, it was funny and interesting and very good all around and I think you should see it.*

*Assuming you are someone who does not find f-bombs, somewhat real-world graphic sex and the romantic comedy genre turned on its ear offensive.  (In other words, it’s a NFS (not for Sara) production.)

ps. Mad Men fans.  You MUST see this just because Alison Brie, the woman who plays Trudy Campbell is so incredibly awesome.

pps. Good date movie. Assuming both people in the couple meet the above qualifications.

poster from: http://www.impawards.com/2012/five_year_engagement.html

Three sentence movie reviews: Ca$h

I had to go to Netflix for this movie as the library and my local video store did not carry it.*  It was a low-budget indie, and suffered a bit from both the low budget and the indie, I think.  Though it did bring up some interesting questions, had the most screen time with Chris Hemsworth of any of his movies, and Sean Bean was quite good.

*the movie poster isn’t even on my favorite movie poster site.

Three sentence movie reviews: A Perfect Getaway

Yet another movie watched to see Chris Hemsworth, this was surprisingly good, as it has a forgettable title and a somewhat overwrought synopsis.  However, I’ve always loved Steve Zahn, finding him the male Judy Greer* of the 90s, and his presence offset my outright dislike of Milla Jovovich.**  This is a great ensemble cast (though Chris Hemsworth’s screen time is minimal) and just when I figured it all out, I got confused again.

*You know, the best friend.  In Steve Zahn’s case he was always the zany best friend.  Except for that grim turn in Riding in Cars With Boys. Rest assured he does not play the zany best friend in this movie, he gets to be the star.


**I think this dislike stems from us being pretty much the same age, but when I was a pimply, awkward 12-year-old I got to see feature stories in the teen magazines I read at the time about this amazingly beautiful 12-year-old model with an odd name.  Plus later, when she was 16, she got to hang out with all the Dazed and Confused cast despite the fact she wasn’t really a very good actress.  I wasn’t a good actress either, but I had to go to high school every day, not run off over the border and get married for two months to that odd-looking guy from the movie.  Sure, there was an annulment because she was underage, but still.  And don’t even get me started about the whole music phase.  I’ve mellowed in my old age, because despite 20+ years of dislike, I thought she was good in this.

Books read in June 2012

Ah-hah!  Only 3 YA (and younger) books this month!

Read
Gay Romance Novel #1
Jan Wilson
My friend gave me a draft of her novel to read.  I loved it!  I’ll let you know when it becomes available for all of you to read.

Pretties
Scott Westerfeld
This is the second book in the Uglies series, we follow along with Tally’s adventures and moral quandaries.  The ending had me reserving the next book in the series.  Unfortunately, there is a line, and it’s proving to be quite long.

The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
Douglas Adams
Read aloud.
I’ve not read this since Junior High and I greatly enjoyed revisiting the story.

The Sisters Brothers
Patrick DeWitt
I did not like this book and I spent a lot of time wondering why.  I liked the main character, he was quite sympathetic.  The plot was interesting, and the writing quite good.  The San Francisco Gold Rush setting was  to my liking.  But I never took to it, though I read all the way to the end.

Chloe and the Lion
Mac Burnett & Adam Rex
Funny!  This was recommended by my friend Sara and I got it from the library even though it was a picture book and I don’t usually spend time reading them.  I read it and spent ten minutes laughing out loud alone in the house. Laughing out loud while reading by myself is always an odd pleasure for me.  There’s the laughter, which is great, but then the kind of creepy feeling that I might be a little crazy. After I enjoyed it, I insisted that Matt read it.  Now I’m insisting that you do too. It will take 10 minutes.  Laughter is good for you. Maybe you can read it aloud to someone so you can both laugh together and avoid the creepy feeling.  Just do it.

Women of the Silk
Gail Tsukiyama
Read for Kenton Book Club
This was okay.  I liked that it had a setting that was foreign to me.  I liked that it was about women.  The silk work was interesting.  Other than that, the book never grabbed me.  What was interesting was that during the book group discussion, most of the women did not like the book and most of the men did.  Several people in book group (men and women) had read Samuri Gardens by the same author and recommended that book over this one. I shall perhaps see what that is all about.

Arcadia
Lauren Goff
I greatly enjoyed the author’s earlier works, the Monsters of Templeton, and was happy to read this new novel about Bit, a child growing up on a commune during the 1970s.  The book is divided into four sections, checking in with Bit at four different ages.  I found the first two to be the most compelling.  The last two sections were not as magical as the first two, but that might have been by design.  It was still a good read, with some quite funny observations of 1970s hippie culture.

Sister
Rosmund Lupton
Gripping mystery set in London.  A friend at work read it, recommended it to myself and another friend at work and we all read it within a week of each other so we could have a mini book discussion group.

Mockingjay
Suzanne Collins
Matt and I read aloud.
As before, the gripping ending to the story.  In the end, everything works out.  It’s just rough going getting there.

Dear Photograph
Taylor Jones
This is a great concept that became popular because of the internet, but which I discovered in the book store.  The discovery in a bricks-and-mortar store over the bits and bytes cheers me.  At any rate, some of the entries are incredibly moving.  This is also one of those good books where you needn’t read much to read it, as it is mostly photos.


Started and did not finish.
I finished everything I started this month.

Cougars, Coeds and Chick Lit.

I am here to tell you that I reject the following terms and
will not being using them: Cougars, Coeds and Chick Lit. I invite you all to
join in my campaign.
Cougars.  This has
come into fashion in the last few years, its name even graces(graced) (ahem) a
TV show.  A Cougar is an older woman who
is dating—or married to—a (much) younger man. 
They have now split, but the Demi Moore, Ashton Kutcher union comes to
mind.
Coeds.  For years, I
read books that included the term Coed and I assumed it meant college student,
either male or female.  I assumed that
once colleges opened their doors to both men and women, the education was
coeducational and thus the students were called coeds.  I can still recall the feeling of horror I
felt my senior year in high school when the sentence structure I was reading
did not support this definition and I was forced to consider that the term only
applied to females.  I refused to believe
this, at first, but double checked with my mother who confirmed the grim news.
Chick Lit.  First of
all, this is an awful term because when it is said it aloud, a large percentage
of people think you are discussing gum (Chiclets) and then there is usually a
weird cognitive dissonance moment.  Chick
Lit is a novel written primarily for women and it usually contains some
elements of a romantic story and happy ending, though it should not be
considered the same as a “romance novel.” 
There is often something of one of these elements:  zaniness, work drama, conversation with best
friends.  Sometimes there is great
tragedy to overcome.
Why do we need to end our use of these terms?  I reject them all because they are all terms
focused on women that have no equivalent
for males.
 What do you call an older
man who dates/marries a much younger woman? 
There is no term, as it is an accepted practice in our society.  If you are channeling your inner frat boy,
you might call the man in question “lucky” and snigger after saying it.  What do you call a male student at a
college?  A student.  There is certainly no term that suggests that
they are added on to the scene and maybe it is okay they are there, they are
pretty and all, but they are not real students.
As for Chick Lit, are there no novels of fluff written for
men?  Of course there are.  What do we call them?  There is no term.  There are many genre specific terms of kinds
of fluff novels that are primarily read by men: 
science fiction, fantasy, spy thrillers, etc.  Though those genre specific books aren’t
looked upon as great literature, they are also not dismissed out of hand with
an overarching title:  Sperm Lit,
perhaps?
Language reflects our values and beliefs and none of these
three terms reflects an equality between women and men we pretend we have in
society.  Granted, our language
concerning gender is at a disadvantage from the get-go as the common terms we
use to describe the not-male part of the population (women, woman, female)
cannot be used without summoning the male part of the species.  Undoing this would be quite a feat and it is
not what I am here to do today.  Today, I
am just asking you to think before you use the above three terms.  If you chose to use them, what are you saying
about women’s place in the world?